Skip to content

write-chapter: author chapters single-pass (drop the multi-agent Workflow)#38

Merged
yagop merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
skill-single-pass-authoring
Jun 16, 2026
Merged

write-chapter: author chapters single-pass (drop the multi-agent Workflow)#38
yagop merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
skill-single-pass-authoring

Conversation

@yagop

@yagop yagop commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Per request, the write-chapter skill no longer uses the multi-agent Workflow (and is no longer branded "ultracode").

What changed

  • Step 4 ("Spawn the Workflow" → "Write the chapter and the samples"): the chapter doc and every sample are now authored directly in the working tree. No Workflow/agent()/pipeline() calls, no args object.
  • Appendix A ("the Workflow script" → "how to write and review the files"): the ~110-line orchestration script is replaced by a concise writing guide + the review checklist — the same adversarial checks the old review agent ran (no invented SDK surface, convention violations, bun run failures, placeholders, non-ASCII, golfed code), now run by hand over each file before committing.
  • Intro, steps 5/6, and Special cases reworded from "the Workflow returns…/the review agents…" to single-pass language. The Review-flags concept is kept.
  • Appendix B conventions are byte-identical (only the heading parenthetical changed, since args.conventions no longer exists).

Net: 241 → 134 lines. As a bonus this removes the escaped-backtick footgun in the old embedded script (the (`:::`) that broke a prior run).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…flow

The skill no longer spawns a Workflow (and is no longer branded "ultracode").
Step 4 now writes the chapter doc and every sample directly in the working
tree; Appendix A becomes a writing + self-review checklist (the same
adversarial checks the review agent used to run). Appendix B conventions
are unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@yagop yagop merged commit 7d7d3c3 into main Jun 16, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant