BE-590: hgraph: Refactor entity query handlers into `entity/query` submodule by indietyp · Pull Request #8840 · hashintel/hash

indietyp · 2026-06-08T11:41:49Z

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

The entity query request types and their associated HTTP handler functions have been refactored out of a single flat module into a dedicated entity/query submodule hierarchy. As part of this, the old entity_query_request.rs file — which contained a large amount of dead code related to a planned HashQL integration, proxy deserialization structs, and a four-variant subgraph enum — has been removed entirely.

The new QueryEntitiesRequest and QueryEntitySubgraphRequest types are simpler: QueryEntitiesRequest is now a plain struct with a filter field directly (no EntityQuery enum wrapping a filter or raw HashQL value), and QueryEntitySubgraphRequest is a two-variant untagged enum (Paths / ResolveDepths) rather than four variants. The into_params and into_traversal_params methods are now on the request types themselves rather than on a separate EntityQueryOptions struct, removing an intermediate layer.

The Interactive header parameter has also been removed from the query_entities and query_entity_subgraph OpenAPI path definitions, as it was only relevant to the HashQL compilation path that no longer exists in these handlers.

🔗 Related links

https://linear.app/hash/issue/BE-537/hashql-remove-old-backend-wire-up-hashql-in-the-api

🔍 What does this change?

Converts entity.rs into entity/mod.rs and extracts query handlers into entity/query/mod.rs and request types into entity/query/request.rs.
Removes entity_query_request.rs and all dead code it contained: EntityQuery, EntityQueryOptions, FlatQueryEntitiesRequestData, CompilationOptions, HashQL diagnostic rendering, and the four-variant QueryEntitySubgraphRequest.
Replaces the EntityQuery::Filter / EntityQuery::Query split with a direct filter: Filter<'q, Entity> field on QueryEntitiesRequest.
Moves into_params and into_traversal_params onto QueryEntitiesRequest and QueryEntitySubgraphRequest respectively, eliminating EntityQueryOptions as a separate type.
Removes the Interactive header from query_entities and query_entity_subgraph handler signatures and OpenAPI docs.
Updates benchmark code in tests/graph/benches to use the simplified request types directly, removing the into_parts / from_parts round-trips that previously extracted an EntityQuery and EntityQueryOptions.
Adds unit tests in entity/query/request.rs covering deserialization of both request types, including required-field validation and correct disambiguation of the Paths vs ResolveDepths subgraph variants.

🛡 What tests cover this?

New unit tests in libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/entity/query/request.rs covering minimal and fully-populated QueryEntitiesRequest deserialization, rejection of missing required fields, and correct parsing of both QueryEntitySubgraphRequest variants including edge cases around ontology vs entity traversal edges.

❓ How to test this?

Checkout the branch.
Run cargo test in libs/@local/graph/api.
Exercise the /entities/query, /entities/query/subgraph, and /entities/query/count endpoints and confirm they behave as before.

chore: add new dependency chore: format feat: error module feat: introduce hashql_eval interner chore: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint chore: remove old value module feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint chore: checkpoint feat: move entity query into its own modul fix: query request feat: checkpoint (it compiles!) feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint fix: issue around cached thunking feat: covariance for opaque inners fix: cfgattr serde chore: remove graph module fix: merge fuckup

cursor · 2026-06-08T11:41:57Z

PR Summary

High Risk
Breaking HTTP/OpenAPI changes (required filter, removed query and Interactive/query pagination params) plus a large refactor of core entity query routes; clients and generated SDKs must be updated.

Overview
Refactors entity query, subgraph, and summarize HTTP handlers into entity/query/ and deletes entity_query_request.rs along with the unused HashQL compilation path (EntityQuery, EntityQueryOptions, proxy deserializers, diagnostic rendering).

API contract: QueryEntitiesRequest is now a single object with a required filter (no query / filter union). QueryEntitySubgraphRequest collapses to two untagged variants (Paths / ResolveDepths) that flatten the shared fields via QueryEntitiesRequest. into_params / into_traversal_params live on those types; subgraph traversal limits are validated in the new module. The Interactive header and OpenAPI query params after / limit on query/subgraph routes are removed—cursor and limit stay in the JSON body. Regenerated openapi.json drops EntityQueryOptions and reflects the flatter schemas.

Dependencies: hash-graph-api no longer depends on hashql-* crates (Cargo.toml, package.json, lockfiles); dependency diagrams are updated accordingly.

Other: Graph query benchmarks import the new request types and call into_params_unchecked / into_traversal_params_unchecked; SearchEntitiesRequest stays on entity/mod.rs. New deserialization tests cover required fields and subgraph variant disambiguation.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 6daec9b. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

vercel · 2026-06-08T11:42:00Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jul 3, 2026 4:36pm

2 Skipped Deployments

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ignored	Preview	Jul 3, 2026 4:36pm
petrinaut	Skipped		Jul 3, 2026 4:36pm

indietyp · 2026-06-08T11:42:01Z

BE-614: HashQL: Generate synthetic closure bodies for intrinsics used as first-class values #8895
BE-615: HashQL: Introduce the concept of synthetic closures in the MIR #8894
BE-607: HashQL: Refactor ModuleRegistry into builder/immutable split with allocator-generic stdlib construction #8887
BE-538: HashQL: Permission system integration #8882
BE-71: HashQL: Consolidate AST special-form expansion stages into one #8870
BE-481: HashQL: Reify null and empty tuple as unit constants #8853
BE-537, BE-537: hgraph: REST /hashql endpoint with E2E tests #8827
BE-592: HashQL: Remove old eval graph path and core value types #8841
BE-590: hgraph: Refactor entity query handlers into entity/query submodule #8840 👈 (View in Graphite)
BE-587, BE-588: HashQL: Introduce CodeGenerationContext/CodeExecutionContext split and eval-stage Interner #8839
BE-581, BE-589: HashQL: Introduce pass::lower/pass::place pipeline facades and fix cached constructor closure bug #8838
BE-585, BE-591: HashQL: Add MIR interpreter test suite and refactor diagnostic categories #8837
BE-583, BE-584, BE-586: HashQL: Add HeapPool, improve spans, and propagate Critical severity through diagnostics #8836
BE-582: HashQL: Change opaque types from invariant to covariant #8835
main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

codecov · 2026-06-08T11:45:52Z

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 42.76316% with 348 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 59.74%. Comparing base (73c646e) to head (6daec9b).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
.../@local/graph/api/src/rest/entity/query/request.rs	53.83%	216 Missing and 7 partials ⚠️
libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/entity/query/mod.rs	0.00%	112 Missing ⚠️
libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/entity/mod.rs	0.00%	13 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8840      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   59.61%   59.74%   +0.13%     
==========================================
  Files        1366     1368       +2     
  Lines      132649   132846     +197     
  Branches     6044     6052       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits        79078    79370     +292     
+ Misses      52637    52532     -105     
- Partials      934      944      +10

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.39% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`6.39% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-backend-utils	`2.81% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`10.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`0.18% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-net	`96.23% <ø> (+0.03%)`	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	`67.03% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-codec	`72.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`8.23% <42.76%> (+5.69%)`	⬆️
rust.hashql-ast	`87.23% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copilot

Pull request overview

Refactors the entity query REST API by moving query request types and handlers into a dedicated rest/entity/query submodule, while removing the legacy entity_query_request.rs module (including dead/unused HashQL-related code paths). This simplifies the request shapes (direct filter struct field; two-variant subgraph request) and updates benchmarks accordingly.

Changes:

Extracts entity query handlers to libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/entity/query/mod.rs and request types (plus deserialization tests) to .../entity/query/request.rs.
Removes libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/entity_query_request.rs and the Interactive header from entity query OpenAPI definitions/handlers.
Updates manual benchmark scaffolding to use the new request types and APIs directly.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 6 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
tests/graph/benches/manual_queries/entity_queries/mod.rs	Updates benchmarks to use the refactored request types and the new `into_*params` APIs.
libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/mod.rs	Drops the old `entity_query_request` module inclusion.
libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/entity/query/request.rs	Introduces simplified request types and adds unit tests for deserialization/variant disambiguation.
libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/entity/query/mod.rs	Adds extracted handlers and updated OpenAPI path definitions without the `Interactive` header.
libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/entity/mod.rs	Wires the new submodule into routing and OpenAPI, removing the inlined legacy handlers/types.
libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/entity_query_request.rs	Removes the legacy request module (dead HashQL/proxy-related code).

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Copilot

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 7 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Copilot

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 7 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/entity/mod.rs:4

This refactor moves QueryEntitiesRequest / QueryEntitySubgraphRequest under entity::query, but the previous public re-exports from hash_graph_api::rest::entity::* are gone. Since hash-graph-api is a published crate, this is a breaking Rust API change for downstream users even though HTTP behavior is unchanged.

Consider re-exporting the request/error types from entity to preserve the old import path (or add a deprecation cycle if you want to force the new path).

Copilot

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 7 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)

libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/entity/mod.rs:226

This router change removes previously-exposed endpoints (/entities/search and /entities/query/summarize) and introduces /entities/query/count, but the PR description frames this as a refactor of entity query handlers and says the endpoints should behave as before. Also, the checked-in OpenAPI snapshot still contains /entities/search and /entities/query/summarize and does not contain /entities/query/count (see libs/@local/graph/api/openapi/openapi.json around the paths section). Please confirm whether these endpoints were intended to be removed/added; if so, update/regenerate the OpenAPI accordingly, and if not, restore the routes/handlers.
libs/@local/graph/api/openapi/openapi.json:1655
The OpenAPI snapshot appears out of sync with the current router/handler set: it still documents /entities/query/summarize and /entities/search (operationIds summarize_entities / search_entities), and it does not document the newly-added /entities/query/count endpoint. This will break client generation and makes it unclear what the supported API surface is. Regenerate/update openapi.json from the current utoipa definitions (or restore the removed endpoints if they are still intended to exist).

          {
            "name": "after",
            "in": "query",
            "description": "The cursor to start reading from",
            "required": false,

codspeed-hq · 2026-07-03T11:41:21Z

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 15.38%

❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 78 untouched benchmarks

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
❌	`bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[64]`	140.8 ns	170 ns	-17.16%
❌	`bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[200]`	185.8 ns	215 ns	-13.57%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

_{Comparing bm/be-590-hgraph-entity-query-request-refactor (6daec9b) with main (7ce07e4)¹}

No successful run was found on main (253c32d) during the generation of this report, so 7ce07e4 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

Copilot

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 8 out of 9 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

cursor

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit c65837f. Configure here.}

Copilot

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 9 out of 11 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/entity/mod.rs:440

This block isn’t rustfmt-formatted (the .change_context(...) call indentation is off). The repo’s Lint workflow runs just format --check for Rust packages (.github/workflows/lint.yml:132-136), so this is likely to fail CI.

Copilot

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 9 out of 11 changed files in this pull request and generated 5 comments.

Copilot

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 36 out of 38 changed files in this pull request and generated 5 comments.

github-actions · 2026-07-03T17:42:52Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$28.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 219 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}12.8 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}16.1 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002	$$14.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 155 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}17.4 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$46.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 477 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.9 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$17.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 158 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}22.7 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527	$$27.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 214 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}16.0 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$29.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 202 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.44 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$4.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}18.8 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 152 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$5.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 52.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}35.7 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}11.5 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52	$$4.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 36.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}21.1 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$6.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}19.2 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108	$$4.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 45.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.98 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 47.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.548 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 51.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}11.9 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2	$$3.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 51.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}13.4 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.57 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$4.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 55.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}35.8 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 46.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}37.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 52.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}29.7 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$4.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}29.0 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27	$$4.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 51.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}32.2 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$4.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}34.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 53.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}31.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$4.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}23.6 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$42.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 373 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$32.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 342 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.732 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$35.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 207 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.776 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$50.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.22 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}55.4 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$43.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 219 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$48.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 202 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.500 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$39.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 214 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.444 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$90.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 691 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.133 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$56.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.97 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}70.6 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$301 \mathrm{ms} \pm 682 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}19.7 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$10.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.254 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$10.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.383 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 133 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$10.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 48.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.084 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$10.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 50.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.968 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.717 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$10.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 54.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.380 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$10.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 51.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.055 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.875 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 50.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.255 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.94 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 48.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.114 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 50.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 53.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.720 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 55.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.280 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 89.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 134 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 46.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.802 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$60.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 415 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}12.1 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 568 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$63.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 375 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$73.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 354 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$82.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 401 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$90.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 522 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$43.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 278 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.132 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$75.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 711 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.527 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$50.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 330 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.996 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$60.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 348 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.808 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$62.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 340 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-11.500 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$62.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 336 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-11.216 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$133 \mathrm{ms} \pm 564 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$146 \mathrm{ms} \pm 649 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$24.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}36.0 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$547 \mathrm{ms} \pm 991 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.169 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

indietyp added 3 commits June 8, 2026 12:36

chore: cleanup

20725f0

chore: remove unused file

ffda678

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 8, 2026 11:41

indietyp mentioned this pull request Jun 8, 2026

BE-582: HashQL: Change opaque types from invariant to covariant #8835

Merged

indietyp mentioned this pull request Jun 8, 2026

BE-583, BE-584, BE-586: HashQL: Add HeapPool, improve spans, and propagate Critical severity through diagnostics #8836

Merged

graphite-app Bot assigned indietyp Jun 8, 2026

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of indietyp June 8, 2026 11:41 View session

vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut June 8, 2026 11:42 Inactive

github-actions Bot added area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team area/tests New or updated tests labels Jun 8, 2026

This was referenced Jun 8, 2026

BE-585, BE-591: HashQL: Add MIR interpreter test suite and refactor diagnostic categories #8837

Merged

BE-581, BE-589: HashQL: Introduce pass::lower/pass::place pipeline facades and fix cached constructor closure bug #8838

Merged

cursor Bot reviewed Jun 8, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/entity/query/request.rs

Copilot AI reviewed Jun 8, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/entity/query/request.rs Outdated

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash June 8, 2026 11:50 View deployment

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-590-hgraph-entity-query-request-refactor branch from 044a4ff to c1e8a90 Compare June 8, 2026 11:55

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-587-hashql-eval-interner-and-context-restructuring branch from 8af8844 to 82bb954 Compare June 8, 2026 11:55

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut June 8, 2026 12:01 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash June 8, 2026 12:03 View deployment

feat: add deny_unknown_fields

0d59d17

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 8, 2026 12:22

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-587-hashql-eval-interner-and-context-restructuring branch from 233e8eb to 0f62210 Compare June 22, 2026 10:51

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut June 22, 2026 10:55 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash June 22, 2026 11:00 View deployment

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-587-hashql-eval-interner-and-context-restructuring branch from 0f62210 to e9a1230 Compare June 22, 2026 12:02

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 22, 2026 12:02

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-590-hgraph-entity-query-request-refactor branch from 5ac6afb to 7083934 Compare June 22, 2026 12:02

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of indietyp June 22, 2026 12:02 View session

Copilot AI reviewed Jun 22, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/entity/query/mod.rs

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/entity/query/mod.rs

This was referenced Jun 22, 2026

BE-615: HashQL: Introduce the concept of synthetic closures in the MIR #8894

Open

BE-614: HashQL: Generate synthetic closure bodies for intrinsics used as first-class values #8895

Open

Copilot AI reviewed Jun 23, 2026

View reviewed changes

cursor Bot reviewed Jun 30, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/entity/query/mod.rs

github-advanced-security AI found potential problems Jun 30, 2026

View reviewed changes

Copilot AI reviewed Jun 30, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/entity/query/mod.rs

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/entity/query/mod.rs

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/entity/query/mod.rs Outdated

indietyp added 2 commits July 3, 2026 13:34

feat: code review

ee41654

fix: benchmark

b6bac17

Copilot AI reviewed Jul 3, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/entity/query/mod.rs

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/entity/query/mod.rs

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/openapi/openapi.json Outdated

indietyp added 3 commits July 3, 2026 16:24

fix: openapi spec

7262485

fix: invalid argument

c19bed9

fix: invalid argument

c65837f

cursor Bot reviewed Jul 3, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/src/rest/entity/query/request.rs

indietyp added 2 commits July 3, 2026 16:31

fix: sync turborepo

d1e5b89

chore: lockfile

68dba8d

Copilot AI reviewed Jul 3, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/graph/api/Cargo.toml

Copilot AI reviewed Jul 3, 2026

View reviewed changes

indietyp added 2 commits July 3, 2026 17:20

fix: diagram

004caa8

chore: remove unused query params

6daec9b

Copilot AI reviewed Jul 3, 2026

View reviewed changes

Uh oh!

Conversation

indietyp commented Jun 8, 2026

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

🔗 Related links

🔍 What does this change?

🛡 What tests cover this?

❓ How to test this?

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented Jun 8, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Jun 8, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

indietyp commented Jun 8, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Jun 8, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Reviewed changes

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jul 3, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 15.38%

Performance Changes

Footnotes

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented Jun 8, 2026 •

edited

Loading

vercel Bot commented Jun 8, 2026 •

edited

Loading

indietyp commented Jun 8, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented Jun 8, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jul 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading