docs(self-hosted): update data flow diagram#18454
Open
aldy505 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
1 Skipped Deployment
|
![sentry[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/12637?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| kafka -- Fetch tasks --> taskbroker | ||
| taskbroker -- Process and analyze mobile app --> launchpad | ||
| taskworker -- Fetch tasks to execute --> taskbroker | ||
| taskworker -- As a buffer and distributed lock --> redis |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug: The data flow diagram incorrectly shows a taskworker to redis connection and places task components in the wrong subgraph.
Severity: LOW
Suggested Fix
Update the Mermaid diagram in develop-docs/self-hosted/data-flow.mdx. Remove the connection between taskworker and redis. Move the taskbroker and taskworker nodes from the 'Event Processing' subgraph to the 'Web User Interface' subgraph to align with the textual description and the current architecture.
Prompt for AI Agent
Review the code at the location below. A potential bug has been identified by an AI
agent. Verify if this is a real issue. If it is, propose a fix; if not, explain why it's
not valid.
Location: develop-docs/self-hosted/data-flow.mdx#L49
Potential issue: The data flow diagram in `develop-docs/self-hosted/data-flow.mdx`
contains inaccuracies regarding the task processing architecture. It incorrectly shows a
connection from `taskworker` to `redis`, which is a remnant of a deprecated
architecture; `taskworker` now communicates with `taskbroker` via gRPC. Additionally,
the diagram places `taskbroker` and `taskworker` within the 'Event Processing' subgraph,
which contradicts the textual description in the same file that associates them with the
'Web User Interface' flow.
Also affects:
develop-docs/self-hosted/data-flow.mdx:46~56
Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
DESCRIBE YOUR PR
Tell us what you're changing and why. If your PR resolves an issue, please link it so it closes automatically.
IS YOUR CHANGE URGENT?
Help us prioritize incoming PRs by letting us know when the change needs to go live.
SLA
Thanks in advance for your help!
PRE-MERGE CHECKLIST
Make sure you've checked the following before merging your changes:
LEGAL BOILERPLATE
Look, I get it. The entity doing business as "Sentry" was incorporated in the State of Delaware in 2015 as Functional Software, Inc. and is gonna need some rights from me in order to utilize my contributions in this here PR. So here's the deal: I retain all rights, title and interest in and to my contributions, and by keeping this boilerplate intact I confirm that Sentry can use, modify, copy, and redistribute my contributions, under Sentry's choice of terms.
EXTRA RESOURCES