Skip to content

chore!: update protobufs to be in sync with datadog-agent#2180

Merged
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
duncan-harvey/trace-protobuf
Jul 1, 2026
Merged

chore!: update protobufs to be in sync with datadog-agent#2180
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
duncan-harvey/trace-protobuf

Conversation

@duncanpharvey

@duncanpharvey duncanpharvey commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

  • Update protobufs to be in sync with datadog-agent
    • containerDebug
    • additional_metric_tags
  • Update DATADOG_AGENT_TAG for protobufs comparison to DataDog/datadog-agent@fdc29d4

Motivation

Out of sync protobufs with datadog-agent. Needed for #2170.

Additional Notes

Screenshot 2026-06-29 at 3 03 21 PM

How to test the change?

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Clippy Allow Annotation Report

Comparing clippy allow annotations between branches:

  • Base Branch: origin/main
  • PR Branch: origin/duncan-harvey/trace-protobuf

Summary by Rule

Rule Base Branch PR Branch Change
todo 2 2 No change (0%)
unimplemented 1 1 No change (0%)
Total 3 3 No change (0%)

Annotation Counts by File

File Base Branch PR Branch Change
libdd-trace-utils/src/trace_utils.rs 2 2 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-utils/src/tracer_payload.rs 1 1 No change (0%)

Annotation Stats by Crate

Crate Base Branch PR Branch Change
clippy-annotation-reporter 5 5 No change (0%)
datadog-ffe-ffi 1 1 No change (0%)
datadog-ipc 22 22 No change (0%)
datadog-live-debugger 4 4 No change (0%)
datadog-live-debugger-ffi 10 10 No change (0%)
datadog-profiling-replayer 4 4 No change (0%)
datadog-sidecar 45 45 No change (0%)
libdd-common 13 13 No change (0%)
libdd-common-ffi 12 12 No change (0%)
libdd-data-pipeline 6 6 No change (0%)
libdd-ddsketch 2 2 No change (0%)
libdd-dogstatsd-client 1 1 No change (0%)
libdd-profiling 13 13 No change (0%)
libdd-remote-config 3 3 No change (0%)
libdd-telemetry 20 20 No change (0%)
libdd-tinybytes 4 4 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-normalization 2 2 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-obfuscation 3 3 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-stats 1 1 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-utils 11 11 No change (0%)
Total 182 182 No change (0%)

About This Report

This report tracks Clippy allow annotations for specific rules, showing how they've changed in this PR. Decreasing the number of these annotations generally improves code quality.

@datadog-official

datadog-official Bot commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tests

🎉 All green!

🧪 All tests passed
❄️ No new flaky tests detected

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
Patch Coverage: 100.00%
Overall Coverage: 73.97% (-0.01%)

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: fbb6a57 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@duncanpharvey duncanpharvey force-pushed the duncan-harvey/trace-protobuf branch from 40583a8 to 13da553 Compare June 29, 2026 18:01
@duncanpharvey duncanpharvey changed the title chore: update protobufs to be in sync with datadog-agent chore!: update protobufs to be in sync with datadog-agent Jun 29, 2026
@duncanpharvey duncanpharvey force-pushed the duncan-harvey/trace-protobuf branch from 13da553 to bcd399f Compare June 29, 2026 18:31
@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Artifact Size Benchmark Report

aarch64-alpine-linux-musl
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/aarch64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 85.13 MB 85.13 MB +0% (+696 B) 👌
/aarch64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 7.82 MB 7.82 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 96.27 MB 96.27 MB +0% (+728 B) 👌
/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 10.51 MB 10.51 MB +0% (+24 B) 👌
libdatadog-x64-windows
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 25.14 MB 25.14 MB +0% (+512 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 88.04 KB 88.04 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 183.32 MB 183.33 MB +0% (+8.00 KB) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 938.88 MB 939.07 MB +.01% (+188.05 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 8.22 MB 8.22 MB +0% (+512 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 88.04 KB 88.04 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 24.30 MB 24.30 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 48.47 MB 48.47 MB +0% (+496 B) 👌
libdatadog-x86-windows
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 21.79 MB 21.79 MB +0% (+512 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 89.42 KB 89.42 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 187.40 MB 187.41 MB +0% (+8.00 KB) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 927.44 MB 927.62 MB +.01% (+184.27 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 6.35 MB 6.35 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 89.42 KB 89.42 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 26.09 MB 26.09 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 46.11 MB 46.11 MB +0% (+406 B) 👌
x86_64-alpine-linux-musl
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/x86_64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 75.88 MB 75.88 MB +0% (+632 B) 👌
/x86_64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 8.70 MB 8.70 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 91.34 MB 91.34 MB +0% (+560 B) 👌
/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 10.59 MB 10.59 MB 0% (0 B) 👌

@duncanpharvey duncanpharvey marked this pull request as ready for review June 29, 2026 19:04
@duncanpharvey duncanpharvey requested review from a team as code owners June 29, 2026 19:04

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: bcd399f658

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

/// containerDebug holds debug information about the container tags resolution.
/// @gotags: json:"container_debug,omitempty" msg:"container_debug,omitempty"
#[prost(message, optional, tag = "11")]
pub container_debug: ::core::option::Option<ContainerDebug>,

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Compare container_debug before merging payloads

When callers pass V07 payloads with this field populated, coalesce_send_data() still invokes TracerPayloadCollection::merge(), which treats payloads as equal via cmp_send_data_payloads() without looking at container_debug and then appends one payload's chunks into the other while dropping its top-level fields. Two payloads with different container tag resolution errors/latencies will therefore be sent as one payload with only the retained payload's debug value, misreporting the new diagnostics for the chunks from the dropped payload; include container_debug in the merge key or avoid merging when it differs.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed in f8b4091.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: b386a6fc90

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

/// containerDebug holds debug information about the container tags resolution.
/// @gotags: json:"container_debug,omitempty" msg:"container_debug,omitempty"
#[prost(message, optional, tag = "11")]
pub container_debug: ::core::option::Option<ContainerDebug>,

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Omit absent container debug from msgpack payloads

When sending V07 payloads through send_with_msgpack, every locally constructed tracer payload currently sets this field to None; because the generated serde field has no skip_serializing_if, rmp_serde::to_vec_named emits a container_debug: nil entry instead of omitting it, despite the new proto tag being omitempty. That changes the v0.7 wire map for all agentless sends even when no debug data exists, so please generate #[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")] for this field.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed in f97eaf5.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: f97eaf5059

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

/// @gotags: json:"container_debug,omitempty" msg:"container_debug,omitempty"
#[prost(message, optional, tag = "11")]
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub container_debug: ::core::option::Option<ContainerDebug>,

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Default omitted ContainerDebug subfields

When a Serde-encoded v0.7 payload includes container_debug but omits any of its omitempty subfields (for example a successful lookup may send only latency/buffering data and omit error), deserialization will fail because the nested ContainerDebug fields are still required. The Option here only handles the whole container_debug field being absent; please add #[serde(default)] for the ContainerDebug fields/type in the generator so Rust accepts the same partial payloads allowed by the proto/go tags.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed in fbb6a57.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@codex review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Delightful!

Reviewed commit: fbb6a5753b

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@duncanpharvey

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-07-01 18:49:57 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-07-01 18:50:02 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 1h (p90).


2026-07-01 19:34:53 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot merged commit b02d454 into main Jul 1, 2026
100 checks passed
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot deleted the duncan-harvey/trace-protobuf branch July 1, 2026 19:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants