Skip to content

feat(trace-utils)!: add v1 decoder#2174

Open
anais-raison wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
anais/add-v1-decoder
Open

feat(trace-utils)!: add v1 decoder#2174
anais-raison wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
anais/add-v1-decoder

Conversation

@anais-raison

@anais-raison anais-raison commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Adds a V1 msgpack decoder in libdd-trace-utils and wires the V1 variant through the trace pipeline so any V1 payload can be decoded, inspected, and re-encoded.

Motivation

APMSP-2813 : Prerequisite for the sidecar V1-native path. Splitting out the libdd-trace-utils / libdd-data-pipeline plumbing so it can land before the sidecar wiring.

Additional Notes

  • Mirrors the existing v04 decoder structure.
  • trace_serializer.rs now dispatches on (TraceChunks, OutputFormat); the existing v0.4 → V1 cross-encode path is preserved.
  • trace_utils::collect_trace_chunks renamed to convert_trace_chunks_v04_to_v05.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📚 Documentation Check Results

⚠️ 1937 documentation warning(s) found

📦 libdd-data-pipeline - 1205 warning(s)

📦 libdd-trace-utils - 732 warning(s)


Updated: 2026-06-29 17:53:26 UTC | Commit: 2c4a4e0 | missing-docs job results

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Clippy Allow Annotation Report

Comparing clippy allow annotations between branches:

  • Base Branch: origin/main
  • PR Branch: origin/anais/add-v1-decoder

Summary by Rule

Rule Base Branch PR Branch Change
todo 2 2 No change (0%)
unimplemented 1 2 ⚠️ +1 (+100.0%)
unwrap_used 5 6 ⚠️ +1 (+20.0%)
Total 8 10 ⚠️ +2 (+25.0%)

Annotation Counts by File

File Base Branch PR Branch Change
libdd-data-pipeline/src/trace_exporter/trace_serializer.rs 0 1 ⚠️ +1 (N/A)
libdd-trace-utils/src/send_data/mod.rs 5 6 ⚠️ +1 (+20.0%)
libdd-trace-utils/src/trace_utils.rs 2 2 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-utils/src/tracer_payload.rs 1 1 No change (0%)

Annotation Stats by Crate

Crate Base Branch PR Branch Change
clippy-annotation-reporter 5 5 No change (0%)
datadog-ffe-ffi 1 1 No change (0%)
datadog-ipc 22 22 No change (0%)
datadog-live-debugger 4 4 No change (0%)
datadog-live-debugger-ffi 10 10 No change (0%)
datadog-profiling-replayer 4 4 No change (0%)
datadog-sidecar 45 45 No change (0%)
libdd-common 13 13 No change (0%)
libdd-common-ffi 12 12 No change (0%)
libdd-data-pipeline 6 7 ⚠️ +1 (+16.7%)
libdd-ddsketch 2 2 No change (0%)
libdd-dogstatsd-client 1 1 No change (0%)
libdd-profiling 13 13 No change (0%)
libdd-remote-config 3 3 No change (0%)
libdd-telemetry 20 20 No change (0%)
libdd-tinybytes 4 4 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-normalization 2 2 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-obfuscation 3 3 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-stats 1 1 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-utils 11 12 ⚠️ +1 (+9.1%)
Total 182 184 ⚠️ +2 (+1.1%)

About This Report

This report tracks Clippy allow annotations for specific rules, showing how they've changed in this PR. Decreasing the number of these annotations generally improves code quality.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔒 Cargo Deny Results

⚠️ 11 issue(s) found, showing only errors (advisories, bans, sources)

📦 libdd-data-pipeline - 6 error(s)

Show output
error[unsound]: Unsoundness in `Error::downcast_mut()`
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:11:1
   │
11 │ anyhow 1.0.93 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0190
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0190
   ├ Affected versions of this crate violate borrow rules, resulting in undefined behavior, when the user adds context to an error via `Error::context` and then later calls `Error::downcast_mut` on the returned `Error`.
     
     The flaw was corrected in commit `6e8c000` by revising how the mutable reference is constructed, avoiding inclusion of a shared reference in the resulting borrow chain.
     
     ## Example
     
     ```rust
     use anyhow::Error;
     use std::fmt;
     
     #[derive(Debug)]
     struct ErrorContext(&'static str);
     
     impl fmt::Display for ErrorContext {
         fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
             fmt::Display::fmt(&self.0, f)
         }
     }
     
     fn main() {
         let mut error = Error::msg("inner error").context(ErrorContext("old context"));
         let context: &mut ErrorContext = error.downcast_mut().unwrap();
         context.0 = "new context";
         println!("{:?}", error);
     }
     ```
     
     ## Miri output
     
     ```
     error: Undefined Behavior: trying to retag from <1538> for Unique permission at alloc602[0x38], but that tag only grants SharedReadOnly permission for this location
        --> src/ptr.rs:170:18
         |
     170 |         unsafe { &mut *self.ptr.as_ptr() }
         |                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ this error occurs as part of retag at alloc602[0x38..0x48]
         |
         = help: this indicates a potential bug in the program: it performed an invalid operation, but the Stacked Borrows rules it violated are still experimental
         = help: see https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/blob/master/wip/stacked-borrows.md for further information
     help: <1538> was created by a SharedReadOnly retag at offsets [0x38..0x48]
        --> src/ptr.rs:89:18
         |
      89 |             ptr: NonNull::from(ptr),
         |                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
         = note: stack backtrace:
                 0: anyhow::ptr::Mut::<'_, ErrorContext>::deref_mut
                     at src/ptr.rs:170:18: 170:41
                 1: anyhow::error::<impl anyhow::Error>::downcast_mut::<ErrorContext>
                     at src/error.rs:560:18: 560:46
                 2: main
                     at examples/downcast_mut.rs:15:38: 15:58
     ```
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/dtolnay/anyhow/issues/451
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=1.0.103 (try `cargo update -p anyhow`)
   ├ anyhow v1.0.93
     ├── bolero-engine v0.13.4
     │   ├── bolero v0.13.4
     │   │   └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
     │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
     │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
     │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
     │   │       │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
     │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── bolero-afl v0.13.0
     │   │   └── bolero v0.13.4 (*)
     │   ├── bolero-honggfuzz v0.13.0
     │   │   └── bolero v0.13.4 (*)
     │   ├── bolero-kani v0.13.0
     │   │   └── bolero v0.13.4 (*)
     │   └── bolero-libfuzzer v0.13.0
     │       └── bolero v0.13.4 (*)
     ├── libdd-capabilities v2.0.0
     │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
     │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
     │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
     │   │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
     │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
     │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
     │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
     ├── libdd-common v5.0.0
     │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
     │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
     │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
     ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0 (*)
     ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
     ├── libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
     │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
     ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
     ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
     ├── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
     └── prost-derive v0.14.3
         └── prost v0.14.3
             ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
             ├── libdd-ddsketch v1.0.1
             │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
             │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
             │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
             ├── libdd-trace-protobuf v3.0.2
             │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
             │   ├── libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0 (*)
             │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
             │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
             │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
             └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:218:1
    │
218 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-ddsketch v1.0.1
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:245:1
    │
245 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:245:1
    │
245 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:245:1
    │
245 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:286:1
    │
286 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ ## Impact
      
      When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
      service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
      rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
      non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
      
      ## Patches
      
      A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
      rather than exhausting the stack.
      
      ## Workarounds
      
      Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
      the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
    ├ time v0.3.41
      └── tracing-appender v0.2.3
          └── libdd-log v1.0.0
              └── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-trace-utils - 5 error(s)

Show output
error[unsound]: Unsoundness in `Error::downcast_mut()`
  ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:4:1
  │
4 │ anyhow 1.0.93 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
  │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
  │
  ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0190
  ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0190
  ├ Affected versions of this crate violate borrow rules, resulting in undefined behavior, when the user adds context to an error via `Error::context` and then later calls `Error::downcast_mut` on the returned `Error`.
    
    The flaw was corrected in commit `6e8c000` by revising how the mutable reference is constructed, avoiding inclusion of a shared reference in the resulting borrow chain.
    
    ## Example
    
    ```rust
    use anyhow::Error;
    use std::fmt;
    
    #[derive(Debug)]
    struct ErrorContext(&'static str);
    
    impl fmt::Display for ErrorContext {
        fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
            fmt::Display::fmt(&self.0, f)
        }
    }
    
    fn main() {
        let mut error = Error::msg("inner error").context(ErrorContext("old context"));
        let context: &mut ErrorContext = error.downcast_mut().unwrap();
        context.0 = "new context";
        println!("{:?}", error);
    }
    ```
    
    ## Miri output
    
    ```
    error: Undefined Behavior: trying to retag from <1538> for Unique permission at alloc602[0x38], but that tag only grants SharedReadOnly permission for this location
       --> src/ptr.rs:170:18
        |
    170 |         unsafe { &mut *self.ptr.as_ptr() }
        |                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ this error occurs as part of retag at alloc602[0x38..0x48]
        |
        = help: this indicates a potential bug in the program: it performed an invalid operation, but the Stacked Borrows rules it violated are still experimental
        = help: see https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/blob/master/wip/stacked-borrows.md for further information
    help: <1538> was created by a SharedReadOnly retag at offsets [0x38..0x48]
       --> src/ptr.rs:89:18
        |
     89 |             ptr: NonNull::from(ptr),
        |                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
        = note: stack backtrace:
                0: anyhow::ptr::Mut::<'_, ErrorContext>::deref_mut
                    at src/ptr.rs:170:18: 170:41
                1: anyhow::error::<impl anyhow::Error>::downcast_mut::<ErrorContext>
                    at src/error.rs:560:18: 560:46
                2: main
                    at examples/downcast_mut.rs:15:38: 15:58
    ```
  ├ Announcement: https://github.com/dtolnay/anyhow/issues/451
  ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=1.0.103 (try `cargo update -p anyhow`)
  ├ anyhow v1.0.93
    ├── bolero-engine v0.13.4
    │   ├── bolero v0.13.4
    │   │   └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
    │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
    │   ├── bolero-afl v0.13.0
    │   │   └── bolero v0.13.4 (*)
    │   ├── bolero-honggfuzz v0.13.0
    │   │   └── bolero v0.13.4 (*)
    │   ├── bolero-kani v0.13.0
    │   │   └── bolero v0.13.4 (*)
    │   └── bolero-libfuzzer v0.13.0
    │       └── bolero v0.13.4 (*)
    ├── libdd-capabilities v2.0.0
    │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
    │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
    │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
    ├── libdd-common v5.0.0
    │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0 (*)
    │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
    ├── libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
    │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
    ├── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
    └── prost-derive v0.14.3
        └── prost v0.14.3
            ├── libdd-trace-protobuf v3.0.2
            │   ├── libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0 (*)
            │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
            └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:181:1
    │
181 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── (dev) libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:206:1
    │
206 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:206:1
    │
206 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:206:1
    │
206 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

Updated: 2026-06-29 17:55:14 UTC | Commit: 2c4a4e0 | dependency-check job results

@datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Pipelines  Tests

Fix all issues with BitsAI

⚠️ Warnings

🚦 2 Pipeline jobs failed

semver-check | validate   View in Datadog   GitHub Actions

Required checks pass | allchecks   View in Datadog   GitHub Actions

ℹ️ Info

No other issues found (see more)

🧪 All tests passed
❄️ No new flaky tests detected

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
Patch Coverage: 63.10%
Overall Coverage: 73.89% (-0.09%)

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 5434161 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Artifact Size Benchmark Report

aarch64-alpine-linux-musl
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/aarch64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 7.82 MB 7.82 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/aarch64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 85.13 MB 85.18 MB +.05% (+44.36 KB) 🔍
aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 10.51 MB 10.52 MB +.03% (+3.42 KB) 🔍
/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 96.27 MB 96.31 MB +.04% (+42.97 KB) 🔍
libdatadog-x64-windows
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 25.14 MB 25.15 MB +.04% (+10.50 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 88.04 KB 88.04 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 183.32 MB 183.83 MB +.27% (+520.00 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 938.88 MB 941.57 MB +.28% (+2.69 MB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 8.22 MB 8.23 MB +.13% (+11.00 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 88.04 KB 88.04 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 24.30 MB 24.32 MB +.06% (+16.00 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 48.47 MB 48.51 MB +.08% (+40.45 KB) 🔍
libdatadog-x86-windows
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 21.79 MB 21.80 MB +.04% (+9.00 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 89.42 KB 89.42 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 187.40 MB 187.89 MB +.26% (+504.00 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 927.44 MB 930.10 MB +.28% (+2.66 MB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 6.35 MB 6.35 MB +.06% (+4.00 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 89.42 KB 89.42 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 26.09 MB 26.12 MB +.08% (+24.00 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 46.11 MB 46.15 MB +.07% (+37.36 KB) 🔍
x86_64-alpine-linux-musl
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/x86_64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 75.88 MB 75.93 MB +.06% (+47.01 KB) 🔍
/x86_64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 8.70 MB 8.70 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 91.34 MB 91.39 MB +.05% (+47.47 KB) 🔍
/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 10.59 MB 10.59 MB +.02% (+2.96 KB) 🔍

@anais-raison anais-raison marked this pull request as ready for review June 29, 2026 17:54
@anais-raison anais-raison requested review from a team as code owners June 29, 2026 17:54

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 5434161c71

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +107 to +108
if metadata_matches_v1(dest, src) {
dest.chunks.append(&mut src.chunks);

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Keep V1 payloads separate when metadata differs

When coalesce_send_data finds two SendData entries with the same target it always returns true after calling append, so dedup_by drops the source entry. In the V1 branch, a metadata mismatch makes this if false and no chunks are moved, which means all traces from the dropped source payload are lost whenever same-target V1 payloads carry different env/runtime/host/etc. metadata. The append path needs to either merge the chunks safely or let the caller keep both payloads.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

"V1 chunk trace_id must be 16 bytes, got {len}"
)));
}
let bytes = buf.try_slice_and_advance(16).ok_or_else(|| {

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Return an error for truncated V1 trace IDs

For owned decoding, BytesData::try_slice_and_advance indexes the requested range before it can return None, so a malformed V1 payload that declares a 16-byte trace_id but has fewer bytes left will panic here instead of producing the intended DecodeError. Since decode_to_trace_chunks(..., TraceEncoding::V1) decodes external request bodies, truncated /v1.0/traces input can unwind the caller rather than being rejected cleanly.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@anais-raison I don't think this applies only to trace-id, it's anything that calls try_slice_and_advance (including the v04 decoder). Could you just add a guard in that function?

if bytes > buf.len() {                                                                                                                                                                                     
   return None;                                                                                                                                                                                      
}

Comment on lines +288 to +292
("tracer_version", dest.tracer_version == src.tracer_version),
("runtime_id", dest.runtime_id == src.runtime_id),
("env", dest.env == src.env),
("hostname", dest.hostname == src.hostname),
("app_version", dest.app_version == src.app_version),

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Compare V1 payload attributes before appending chunks

This metadata check ignores TracerPayload.attributes, but the append path keeps only dest.attributes while moving src.chunks. If two same-target V1 payloads have identical string metadata but different payload-level attributes such as _dd.apm_mode or git commit data, coalescing sends the source chunks under the destination attributes and drops the source attributes, corrupting the V1 payload metadata.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment on lines +98 to +100
span.attributes.mark_deduped();

Ok(span)

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Validate mandatory V1 span fields before returning

The chunk decoder rejects missing required fields, but the span decoder returns success even when mandatory fields that the V1 encoder always emits, such as span_id and start, are absent. For malformed V1 input this silently forwards a different span using default values (span_id = 0, start = 0) instead of rejecting the payload, which can corrupt traces that pass through the new V1 decode/re-encode path.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment on lines +56 to +58
span.start = decode::read_int::<u64, _>(buf.as_mut_slice()).map_err(|_| {
DecodeError::InvalidFormat("V1 span start u64 read failure".to_owned())
})? as i64;

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Reject out-of-range V1 timestamps instead of wrapping

When a V1 payload contains a start value larger than i64::MAX, this as i64 cast wraps it to a negative timestamp; the V1 encoder later treats negative starts as invalid and replaces them with the current time. Since this decoder handles external V1 request bodies, out-of-range unsigned timestamps should be rejected with a decode error instead of silently changing trace timing; the adjacent duration cast has the same wrapping behavior.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

map.insert(key, value);
}

map.mark_deduped();

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Do not mark flat V1 attributes as deduped

V1 attributes are decoded from a flat array of triplets, not an actual msgpack map, so an incoming payload can contain the same key more than once. Marking the VecMap as deduped here bypasses the encoder's defensive last-write-wins deduplication on re-encode, causing duplicate attributes from external V1 input to be forwarded instead of being normalized or rejected.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@anais-raison anais-raison changed the title feat: add v1 decoder feat(trace-utils)!: add v1 decoder Jun 29, 2026

@ajgajg1134 ajgajg1134 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Another thing we can do here to build confidence in the decoder is take the working dd-trace-go implementation and generate a bunch of various traces and put them just in to flat files, then decode them with this implementation and the trace-agent implementation to make sure they align? (Maybe there's an easier way to check this though)

payload.attributes = span::read_attributes_map(buf, table)?;
}
unknown => {
return Err(DecodeError::InvalidFormat(format!(

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't error out on an unknown payload key, we want to make sure we're forward compatible in case we ever add new keys to this format. If it's an unknown key we should silently drop it

// Integer keys used by the V1 wire format. Kept in sync with the encoder side
// (`msgpack_encoder::v1::{trace_key, chunk_key, SpanKey, SpanLinkKey, SpanEventKey, AnyValueKey}`).

pub(super) mod trace_key {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like the ContainerID key is missing here

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The encoder (v1 and v04->V1) is also not setting ContainerID in-body.

endpoint.as_ref(),
));
}
TracerPayloadCollection::V1(payload) => {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Relevant to this thread, if we're going to set ContainerId in-body, you probably want to strip it out of the headers? It's one of the default ones. Should there be a single set of default headers for all protocols? CC @ajgajg1134

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should actually keep all the normal standard headers here, they're useful in cases where the payload fails to decode for any variety of reasons so that we can tag the metrics with stuff from the HTTP headers which are more likely to make it across successfully

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants