Skip to content

feat(telemetry)!: make telemetry worker wasm-compatible for the TraceExporter#2172

Open
Aaalibaba42 wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
jwiriath/telemetry-wasm
Open

feat(telemetry)!: make telemetry worker wasm-compatible for the TraceExporter#2172
Aaalibaba42 wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
jwiriath/telemetry-wasm

Conversation

@Aaalibaba42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What?

Port the telemetry stack (libdd-telemetry, libdd-data-pipeline) to compile and run on wasm32-unknown-unknown. TelemetryWorker, TelemetryWorkerHandle, and TelemetryClient become generic over a capability bundle C: HttpClientCapability + SleepCapability; native call sites pin to NativeCapabilities.

Why?

Telemetry was previously hard-gated behind #[cfg(not(target_arch = "wasm32"))] and was a no-op on that target for the TraceExporter.

How?

  • Every tokio::time call (sleep, timeout) is replaced by a tokio::select! race against <C as SleepCapability>::new().sleep(…), which resolves to setTimeout on wasm.
  • std::time replaced by web-time (Performance.now() / Date.now() on wasm, re-exports std::time on native).
  • Shutdown signaling adds a tokio::sync::Notify-based async path alongside the existing native Condvar sync path.
  • The old MockClient/file-endpoint logic in http_client.rs is deleted and ported to NativeCapabilities in libdd-capabilities-impl.

Additional Notes

  • TelemetryClientBuilder::build now returns Result (was panicking on missing fields) — Rust API break.
  • TelemetryClient::start is now sync via try_send_msg — Rust API break.
  • FFI and sidecar crates are unaffected at the ABI level; they use a local type alias pinned to NativeCapabilities.

@datadog-official

datadog-official Bot commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tests

🎉 All green!

🧪 All tests passed
❄️ No new flaky tests detected

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
Patch Coverage: 69.00%
Overall Coverage: 74.26% (-0.06%)

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 2f63fe1 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📚 Documentation Check Results

⚠️ 7258 documentation warning(s) found

📦 datadog-sidecar - 2784 warning(s)

📦 libdd-capabilities-impl - 184 warning(s)

📦 libdd-crashtracker - 1074 warning(s)

📦 libdd-data-pipeline - 1194 warning(s)

📦 libdd-telemetry-ffi - 659 warning(s)

📦 libdd-telemetry - 499 warning(s)

📦 libdd-trace-stats - 864 warning(s)


Updated: 2026-07-01 16:10:13 UTC | Commit: ed8b75b | missing-docs job results

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Clippy Allow Annotation Report

Comparing clippy allow annotations between branches:

  • Base Branch: origin/main
  • PR Branch: origin/jwiriath/telemetry-wasm

Summary by Rule

Rule Base Branch PR Branch Change
expect_used 3 0 ✅ -3 (-100.0%)
unwrap_used 26 21 ✅ -5 (-19.2%)
Total 29 21 ✅ -8 (-27.6%)

Annotation Counts by File

File Base Branch PR Branch Change
datadog-sidecar/src/self_telemetry.rs 3 3 No change (0%)
datadog-sidecar/src/service/telemetry.rs 3 3 No change (0%)
libdd-data-pipeline/src/telemetry/mod.rs 1 0 ✅ -1 (-100.0%)
libdd-data-pipeline/src/trace_exporter/mod.rs 2 2 No change (0%)
libdd-telemetry/src/metrics.rs 2 2 No change (0%)
libdd-telemetry/src/worker/http_client.rs 3 0 ✅ -3 (-100.0%)
libdd-telemetry/src/worker/mod.rs 14 10 ✅ -4 (-28.6%)
libdd-trace-stats/src/stats_exporter.rs 1 1 No change (0%)

Annotation Stats by Crate

Crate Base Branch PR Branch Change
clippy-annotation-reporter 5 5 No change (0%)
datadog-ffe-ffi 1 1 No change (0%)
datadog-ipc 22 22 No change (0%)
datadog-live-debugger 4 4 No change (0%)
datadog-live-debugger-ffi 10 10 No change (0%)
datadog-profiling-replayer 4 4 No change (0%)
datadog-sidecar 45 45 No change (0%)
libdd-common 13 13 No change (0%)
libdd-common-ffi 12 12 No change (0%)
libdd-data-pipeline 6 5 ✅ -1 (-16.7%)
libdd-ddsketch 2 2 No change (0%)
libdd-dogstatsd-client 1 1 No change (0%)
libdd-profiling 13 13 No change (0%)
libdd-remote-config 3 3 No change (0%)
libdd-telemetry 20 13 ✅ -7 (-35.0%)
libdd-tinybytes 4 4 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-normalization 2 2 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-obfuscation 3 3 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-stats 1 1 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-utils 11 11 No change (0%)
Total 182 174 ✅ -8 (-4.4%)

About This Report

This report tracks Clippy allow annotations for specific rules, showing how they've changed in this PR. Decreasing the number of these annotations generally improves code quality.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔒 Cargo Deny Results

⚠️ 39 issue(s) found, showing only errors (advisories, bans, sources)

📦 datadog-sidecar - 7 error(s)

Show output
error[unsound]: Unsoundness in `Error::downcast_mut()`
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:14:1
   │
14 │ anyhow 1.0.93 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0190
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0190
   ├ Affected versions of this crate violate borrow rules, resulting in undefined behavior, when the user adds context to an error via `Error::context` and then later calls `Error::downcast_mut` on the returned `Error`.
     
     The flaw was corrected in commit `6e8c000` by revising how the mutable reference is constructed, avoiding inclusion of a shared reference in the resulting borrow chain.
     
     ## Example
     
     ```rust
     use anyhow::Error;
     use std::fmt;
     
     #[derive(Debug)]
     struct ErrorContext(&'static str);
     
     impl fmt::Display for ErrorContext {
         fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
             fmt::Display::fmt(&self.0, f)
         }
     }
     
     fn main() {
         let mut error = Error::msg("inner error").context(ErrorContext("old context"));
         let context: &mut ErrorContext = error.downcast_mut().unwrap();
         context.0 = "new context";
         println!("{:?}", error);
     }
     ```
     
     ## Miri output
     
     ```
     error: Undefined Behavior: trying to retag from <1538> for Unique permission at alloc602[0x38], but that tag only grants SharedReadOnly permission for this location
        --> src/ptr.rs:170:18
         |
     170 |         unsafe { &mut *self.ptr.as_ptr() }
         |                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ this error occurs as part of retag at alloc602[0x38..0x48]
         |
         = help: this indicates a potential bug in the program: it performed an invalid operation, but the Stacked Borrows rules it violated are still experimental
         = help: see https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/blob/master/wip/stacked-borrows.md for further information
     help: <1538> was created by a SharedReadOnly retag at offsets [0x38..0x48]
        --> src/ptr.rs:89:18
         |
      89 |             ptr: NonNull::from(ptr),
         |                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
         = note: stack backtrace:
                 0: anyhow::ptr::Mut::<'_, ErrorContext>::deref_mut
                     at src/ptr.rs:170:18: 170:41
                 1: anyhow::error::<impl anyhow::Error>::downcast_mut::<ErrorContext>
                     at src/error.rs:560:18: 560:46
                 2: main
                     at examples/downcast_mut.rs:15:38: 15:58
     ```
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/dtolnay/anyhow/issues/451
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=1.0.103 (try `cargo update -p anyhow`)
   ├ anyhow v1.0.93
     ├── bolero-engine v0.13.4
     │   ├── bolero v0.13.4
     │   │   ├── (dev) libdd-common-ffi v37.0.0
     │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
     │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v37.0.0
     │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
     │   │   └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
     │   │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
     │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
     │   │       │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
     │   │       │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
     │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
     │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
     │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
     │   │       │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
     │   │       │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
     │   │       │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
     │   │       │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
     │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── bolero-afl v0.13.0
     │   │   └── bolero v0.13.4 (*)
     │   ├── bolero-honggfuzz v0.13.0
     │   │   └── bolero v0.13.4 (*)
     │   ├── bolero-kani v0.13.0
     │   │   └── bolero v0.13.4 (*)
     │   └── bolero-libfuzzer v0.13.0
     │       └── bolero v0.13.4 (*)
     ├── cc_utils v0.1.0
     │   └── (build) spawn_worker v0.0.1
     │       ├── (dev) datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
     │       └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
     ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
     ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
     ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
     ├── libdd-capabilities v2.0.0
     │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
     │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
     │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
     │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
     │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v37.0.0 (*)
     │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
     │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
     │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
     │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
     │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     │   │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
     │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
     │   │   ├── (dev) libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
     │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
     │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
     │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
     ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0 (*)
     ├── libdd-common v5.0.0
     │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
     │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
     │   ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
     │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
     │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-common-ffi v37.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v37.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
     │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
     │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-remote-config v1.0.0
     │   │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0 (*)
     │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
     │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
     │   │   └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v1.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
     │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
     ├── libdd-common-ffi v37.0.0 (*)
     ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
     ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v37.0.0 (*)
     ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0 (*)
     ├── libdd-remote-config v1.0.0 (*)
     ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
     ├── libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
     │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
     ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
     ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
     ├── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
     ├── prost-derive v0.14.3
     │   └── prost v0.14.3
     │       ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0 (*)
     │       ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     │       ├── libdd-ddsketch v1.0.1
     │       │   ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
     │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     │       │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
     │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
     │       ├── libdd-trace-protobuf v3.0.2
     │       │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0 (*)
     │       │   ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
     │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     │       │   ├── libdd-remote-config v1.0.0 (*)
     │       │   ├── libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0 (*)
     │       │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
     │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
     │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
     │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
     └── spawn_worker v0.0.1 (*)

error[unmaintained]: Bincode is unmaintained
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:37:1
   │
37 │ bincode 1.3.3 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unmaintained advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2025-0141
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2025-0141
   ├ Due to a doxxing and harassment incident, the bincode team has taken the decision to cease development permanently.
     
     The team considers version 1.3.3 a complete version of bincode that is not in need of any updates.
     
     ## Alternatives to consider
     
     * [wincode](https://crates.io/crates/wincode)
     * [postcard](https://crates.io/crates/postcard)
     * [bitcode](https://crates.io/crates/bitcode)
     * [rkyv](https://crates.io/crates/rkyv)
   ├ Announcement: https://git.sr.ht/~stygianentity/bincode/tree/v3.0/item/README.md
   ├ Solution: No safe upgrade is available!
   ├ bincode v1.3.3
     ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
     │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
     └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:302:1
    │
302 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      ├── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v37.0.0
      │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │   │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
      │   │   │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │   ├── (dev) libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common-ffi v37.0.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v37.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v37.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-remote-config v1.0.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-ddsketch v1.0.1
      │   ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
              ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
              ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:332:1
    │
332 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
      │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
      │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
      │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v37.0.0
      │   │       │   │       └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── (dev) libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v37.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v37.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v37.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-remote-config v1.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:332:1
    │
332 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
      │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
      │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
      │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v37.0.0
      │   │       │   │       └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── (dev) libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v37.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v37.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v37.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-remote-config v1.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:332:1
    │
332 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
      │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
      │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
      │   │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v37.0.0
      │   │       │   │       └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │       │   │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── (dev) libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v37.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v37.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v37.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-remote-config v1.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       │   └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:395:1
    │
395 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ ## Impact
      
      When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
      service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
      rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
      non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
      
      ## Patches
      
      A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
      rather than exhausting the stack.
      
      ## Workarounds
      
      Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
      the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
    ├ time v0.3.41
      ├── libdd-remote-config v1.0.0
      │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v1.0.0 (*)
      └── tracing-appender v0.2.3
          └── libdd-log v1.0.0
              └── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
                  ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
                  └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-capabilities-impl - 5 error(s)

Show output
error[unsound]: Unsoundness in `Error::downcast_mut()`
  ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:2:1
  │
2 │ anyhow 1.0.93 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
  │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
  │
  ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0190
  ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0190
  ├ Affected versions of this crate violate borrow rules, resulting in undefined behavior, when the user adds context to an error via `Error::context` and then later calls `Error::downcast_mut` on the returned `Error`.
    
    The flaw was corrected in commit `6e8c000` by revising how the mutable reference is constructed, avoiding inclusion of a shared reference in the resulting borrow chain.
    
    ## Example
    
    ```rust
    use anyhow::Error;
    use std::fmt;
    
    #[derive(Debug)]
    struct ErrorContext(&'static str);
    
    impl fmt::Display for ErrorContext {
        fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
            fmt::Display::fmt(&self.0, f)
        }
    }
    
    fn main() {
        let mut error = Error::msg("inner error").context(ErrorContext("old context"));
        let context: &mut ErrorContext = error.downcast_mut().unwrap();
        context.0 = "new context";
        println!("{:?}", error);
    }
    ```
    
    ## Miri output
    
    ```
    error: Undefined Behavior: trying to retag from <1538> for Unique permission at alloc602[0x38], but that tag only grants SharedReadOnly permission for this location
       --> src/ptr.rs:170:18
        |
    170 |         unsafe { &mut *self.ptr.as_ptr() }
        |                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ this error occurs as part of retag at alloc602[0x38..0x48]
        |
        = help: this indicates a potential bug in the program: it performed an invalid operation, but the Stacked Borrows rules it violated are still experimental
        = help: see https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/blob/master/wip/stacked-borrows.md for further information
    help: <1538> was created by a SharedReadOnly retag at offsets [0x38..0x48]
       --> src/ptr.rs:89:18
        |
     89 |             ptr: NonNull::from(ptr),
        |                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
        = note: stack backtrace:
                0: anyhow::ptr::Mut::<'_, ErrorContext>::deref_mut
                    at src/ptr.rs:170:18: 170:41
                1: anyhow::error::<impl anyhow::Error>::downcast_mut::<ErrorContext>
                    at src/error.rs:560:18: 560:46
                2: main
                    at examples/downcast_mut.rs:15:38: 15:58
    ```
  ├ Announcement: https://github.com/dtolnay/anyhow/issues/451
  ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=1.0.103 (try `cargo update -p anyhow`)
  ├ anyhow v1.0.93
    ├── libdd-capabilities v2.0.0
    │   └── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
    ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0 (*)
    └── libdd-common v5.0.0
        └── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0 (*)

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:69:1
   │
69 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
     
     - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
     - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
     - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
     - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
     - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
     
     `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
   ├ rand v0.8.5
     └── (dev) libdd-common v5.0.0
         └── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:82:1
   │
82 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
   ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
     
     Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
     
     Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
     
     This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
   ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
     ├── rustls v0.23.37
     │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
     │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
     │   │       └── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
     │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
     │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
     │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
     │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
     │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
     └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:82:1
   │
82 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
   ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
     
     This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
     This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
     
     Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
     
     This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
   ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
     ├── rustls v0.23.37
     │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
     │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
     │   │       └── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
     │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
     │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
     │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
     │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
     │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
     └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:82:1
   │
82 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
   ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
     or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
     `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
     
     This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
     
     Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
     
     Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
   ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
     ├── rustls v0.23.37
     │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
     │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
     │   │       └── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
     │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
     │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
     │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
     │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
     │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
     └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-crashtracker - 5 error(s)

Show output
error[unsound]: Unsoundness in `Error::downcast_mut()`
  ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:8:1
  │
8 │ anyhow 1.0.93 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
  │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
  │
  ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0190
  ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0190
  ├ Affected versions of this crate violate borrow rules, resulting in undefined behavior, when the user adds context to an error via `Error::context` and then later calls `Error::downcast_mut` on the returned `Error`.
    
    The flaw was corrected in commit `6e8c000` by revising how the mutable reference is constructed, avoiding inclusion of a shared reference in the resulting borrow chain.
    
    ## Example
    
    ```rust
    use anyhow::Error;
    use std::fmt;
    
    #[derive(Debug)]
    struct ErrorContext(&'static str);
    
    impl fmt::Display for ErrorContext {
        fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
            fmt::Display::fmt(&self.0, f)
        }
    }
    
    fn main() {
        let mut error = Error::msg("inner error").context(ErrorContext("old context"));
        let context: &mut ErrorContext = error.downcast_mut().unwrap();
        context.0 = "new context";
        println!("{:?}", error);
    }
    ```
    
    ## Miri output
    
    ```
    error: Undefined Behavior: trying to retag from <1538> for Unique permission at alloc602[0x38], but that tag only grants SharedReadOnly permission for this location
       --> src/ptr.rs:170:18
        |
    170 |         unsafe { &mut *self.ptr.as_ptr() }
        |                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ this error occurs as part of retag at alloc602[0x38..0x48]
        |
        = help: this indicates a potential bug in the program: it performed an invalid operation, but the Stacked Borrows rules it violated are still experimental
        = help: see https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/blob/master/wip/stacked-borrows.md for further information
    help: <1538> was created by a SharedReadOnly retag at offsets [0x38..0x48]
       --> src/ptr.rs:89:18
        |
     89 |             ptr: NonNull::from(ptr),
        |                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
        = note: stack backtrace:
                0: anyhow::ptr::Mut::<'_, ErrorContext>::deref_mut
                    at src/ptr.rs:170:18: 170:41
                1: anyhow::error::<impl anyhow::Error>::downcast_mut::<ErrorContext>
                    at src/error.rs:560:18: 560:46
                2: main
                    at examples/downcast_mut.rs:15:38: 15:58
    ```
  ├ Announcement: https://github.com/dtolnay/anyhow/issues/451
  ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=1.0.103 (try `cargo update -p anyhow`)
  ├ anyhow v1.0.93
    ├── libdd-capabilities v2.0.0
    │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
    │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
    │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
    │   │   │   └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
    │   │   │       └── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
    │   │   └── (dev) libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
    │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
    │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
    │   └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
    ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0 (*)
    ├── libdd-common v5.0.0
    │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0 (*)
    │   ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
    │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
    │   └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
    ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
    ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
    └── prost-derive v0.14.3
        └── prost v0.14.3
            └── libdd-ddsketch v1.0.1
                └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:204:1
    │
204 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │   │   └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │   │       └── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── (dev) libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      └── (dev) libdd-ddsketch v1.0.1
          └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:221:1
    │
221 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │       │   │       └── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── (dev) libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:221:1
    │
221 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │       │   │       └── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── (dev) libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:221:1
    │
221 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
      │   │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │       │   │   └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │       │   │       └── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       │   └── (dev) libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2
      │   │   └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
      │       ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
      │       └── libdd-common v5.0.0 (*)
      └── rustls-platform-verifier v0.6.2 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-data-pipeline - 6 error(s)

Show output
error[unsound]: Unsoundness in `Error::downcast_mut()`
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:11:1
   │
11 │ anyhow 1.0.93 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0190
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0190
   ├ Affected versions of this crate violate borrow rules, resulting in undefined behavior, when the user adds context to an error via `Error::context` and then later calls `Error::downcast_mut` on the returned `Error`.
     
     The flaw was corrected in commit `6e8c000` by revising how the mutable reference is constructed, avoiding inclusion of a shared reference in the resulting borrow chain.
     
     ## Example
     
     ```rust
     use anyhow::Error;
     use std::fmt;
     
     #[derive(Debug)]
     struct ErrorContext(&'static str);
     
     impl fmt::Display for ErrorContext {
         fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
             fmt::Display::fmt(&self.0, f)
         }
     }
     
     fn main() {
         let mut error = Error::msg("inner error").context(ErrorContext("old context"));
         let context: &mut ErrorContext = error.downcast_mut().unwrap();
         context.0 = "new context";
         println!("{:?}", error);
     }
     ```
     
     ## Miri output
     
     ```
     error: Undefined Behavior: trying to retag from <1538> for Unique permission at alloc602[0x38], but that tag only grants SharedReadOnly permission for this location
        --> src/ptr.rs:170:18
         |
     170 |         unsafe { &mut *self.ptr.as_ptr() }
         |                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ this error occurs as part of retag at alloc602[0x38..0x48]
         |
         = help: this indicates a potential bug in the program: it performed an invalid operation, but the Stacked Borrows rules it violated are still experimental
         = help: see https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/blob/master/wip/stacked-borrows.md for further information
     help: <1538> was created by a SharedReadOnly retag at offsets [0x38..0x48]
        --> src/ptr.rs:89:18
         |
      89 |             ptr: NonNull::from(ptr),
         |                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
         = note: stack backtrace:
                 0: anyhow::ptr::Mut::<'_, ErrorContext>::deref_mut
                     at src/ptr.rs:170:18: 170:41
                 1: anyhow::error::<impl anyhow::Error>::downcast_mut::<ErrorContext>
                     at src/error.rs:560:18: 560:46
                 2: main
                     at examples/downcast_mut.rs:15:38: 15:58
     ```
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/dtolnay/anyhow/issues/451
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=1.0.103 (try `cargo update -p anyhow`)
   ├ anyhow v1.0.93
     ├── bolero-engine v0.13.4
     │   ├── bolero v0.13.4
     │   │   └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
     │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
     │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
     │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
     │   │       │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
     │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── bolero-afl v0.13.0
     │   │   └── bolero v0.13.4 (*)
     │   ├── bolero-honggfuzz v0.13.0
     │   │   └── bolero v0.13.4 (*)
     │   ├── bolero-kani v0.13.0
     │   │   └── bolero v0.13.4 (*)
     │   └── bolero-libfuzzer v0.13.0
     │       └── bolero v0.13.4 (*)
     ├── libdd-capabilities v2.0.0
     │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
     │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
     │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
     │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     │   │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
     │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
     │   │   ├── (dev) libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
     │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
     │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
     │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
     ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0 (*)
     ├── libdd-common v5.0.0
     │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
     │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
     │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
     │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
     ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0 (*)
     ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
     ├── libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
     │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
     │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
     ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
     ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
     ├── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
     └── prost-derive v0.14.3
         └── prost v0.14.3
             ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
             ├── libdd-ddsketch v1.0.1
             │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
             │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
             │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
             ├── libdd-trace-protobuf v3.0.2
             │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
             │   ├── libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0 (*)
             │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
             │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
             │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
             └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:218:1
    │
218 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── libdd-common v5.0.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │   ├── (dev) libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-ddsketch v1.0.1
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:245:1
    │
245 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      ├── rustls v0.23.37
      │   ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
      │   │   └── libdd-common...*[Comment body truncated]*

@Aaalibaba42 Aaalibaba42 force-pushed the jwiriath/telemetry-wasm branch from 9042d85 to 6743d39 Compare June 29, 2026 12:13
@Aaalibaba42 Aaalibaba42 marked this pull request as ready for review June 29, 2026 13:42
@Aaalibaba42 Aaalibaba42 requested review from a team as code owners June 29, 2026 13:42
Comment thread libdd-telemetry/src/worker/mod.rs
Comment on lines +67 to +73
let resp = select! {
biased;
result = client.request(req) => result?,
_ = sleeper.sleep(timeout) => {
return Err(anyhow::anyhow!("Telemetry request timed out"));
}
};

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure how common this pattern will be but we could have a helper function client.request_with_timeout(req, timeout)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm a bit reluctant to change the shape of the client Trait directly, but I wouldn't mind a helper function in http.rs, but then it wouldn't be "pinned" on a capability but would just be generic over it, so caller would have to specify the capability again. I'm not sure what's the best here

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm thinking either a method with a default implementation on the trait (so that if there is a simpler/more efficient way to do it in some implementations it can be overridden), or maybe an extension trait to keep it the main trait simple.

Comment thread libdd-data-pipeline/src/trace_exporter/builder.rs Outdated
Comment thread libdd-crashtracker/src/crash_info/telemetry.rs Outdated
@Aaalibaba42 Aaalibaba42 force-pushed the jwiriath/telemetry-wasm branch 3 times, most recently from 0d19b82 to ca34406 Compare July 1, 2026 12:06
@Aaalibaba42 Aaalibaba42 force-pushed the jwiriath/telemetry-wasm branch from ca34406 to 800823d Compare July 1, 2026 12:24

@VianneyRuhlmann VianneyRuhlmann left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The change in shutdown_worker really needs to be discussed further as it can negatively impact shutdown time. Also a lot of comment are very verbose and at wasm specific explanation on public methods doc that shouldn't be cluttered with implementation details.

Comment on lines +946 to +948
/// [`TelemetryWorkerHandle::wait_for_shutdown_async`]) — `Notify` is pure
/// atomics and works on wasm too. `shutdown_finished` triggers both so either
/// path observes the same event.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder wether this is necessary, wait_for_shutdow is only used when the worker is spawned on it's own thread not as a SharedRuntime worker. Since spawn is not available on wasm we can platform-gate shutdown

Comment on lines +321 to +323
// Runtime-agnostic timeout: race the mailbox against a capability-driven sleep
// instead of `tokio::time::timeout_at`, which requires a tokio reactor (not
// available on wasm where we run on the JS event loop).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You don't need to re-explain the capabilities every time the old comment is fine

Comment on lines +324 to +328
let sleeper = <C as SleepCapability>::new();
tokio::select! {
biased;
mailbox_action = self.mailbox.recv() => mailbox_action,
_ = sleeper.sleep(remaining) => Some(TelemetryActions::Lifecycle(deadline_action)),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not specifically for this PR but should we add a helper for timeout to the sleeper capability ?

Comment on lines +1164 to +1167
/// Capability-driven sleep so the same code path works on native (tokio
/// reactor) and wasm (JS `setTimeout` via [`SleepCapability`]). The spawn
/// mechanism is platform-specific but the public API and observable
/// behavior are identical.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No need to re-explicit the wasm specific behavior in all methods (especially public ones) this is an implementation detail

Comment on lines +1440 to +1443
/// Native-only convenience entry point. Wasm callers should construct via
/// [`Self::build_worker`] and hand the worker to a
/// [`SharedRuntime`](libdd_shared_runtime::SharedRuntime) like
/// `LocalRuntime`.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That seems a bit heavy, especially since the method is not available on wasm. It should be enough to document the build_worker method


async fn shutdown_workers(self) {
// Sequential rather than the previous `JoinSet`-driven concurrent stop:
// there are at most ~3 workers and each stop is fast, so the parallelism

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's not true some stop require flushing to the agent which can be long especially if we have to retry. This is critical as this is delaying the tracer shutdown an thus the time to restart the customer app

Comment on lines +38 to +41
# Cross-platform `Instant`/`SystemTime`. On native it re-exports `std::time`; on
# wasm32-unknown-unknown it backs by `Performance.now()` and `Date.now()` via
# `js-sys`, which avoids the `time not implemented on this platform` panic that
# `std::time::Instant::now()` raises on that target.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No need to clutter the cargo.toml. Documenting web-time usage in rust code is enough imo, or maximum a single line comment

Comment on lines +849 to +851
// Runtime-agnostic timeout: race the request against a capability-driven sleep,
// mirroring `agent_info::fetcher::fetch_and_hash_response`. Same pattern, same
// reason: `tokio::time::sleep` needs a tokio reactor that wasm doesn't provide.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's fine to not re-explain the purpose of capability at every call-site

Comment on lines +1371 to +1372
/// On wasm, cancellation deadlines are driven by `wasm_bindgen_futures::spawn_local` and
/// no runtime handle is required.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wasm always uses the SharedRuntime right ? There should be any need to run on spawn_local

Comment on lines +5 to +6
// web_time::Instant is std::time::Instant on native and a Performance.now()
// backed shim on wasm32-unknown-unknown (std::time::Instant panics there).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: I don't think this needs to be called out at every import

@Aaalibaba42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

The change in shutdown_worker really needs to be discussed further as it can negatively impact shutdown time

We can always have the previous native implementation as is in a #[cfg(not(target_arch="wasm32"))] to make sure we have no impact on native

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants